My main gripe is that Nuendo still does not support high end GPUs properly I ‘still’ get laggy screen update behaviour that is apparently related to Nvidia drivers, in this case, the latest Studio drivers for an RTX 2080Ti. At some point, Resolve Fairlight is going to develop to the stage where round tripping is no longer necessary, but for now, that design remain a little odd and somewhat buggy in places, eg, Audio interface patching IO, no ASIO support, some odd editing processes by comparison to what we now expect in DAW ‘conventions’ such as found in ProTools, Nuendo etc. If DVD (rare) I use something like Ashampoo Burning Studio or Premier Elements. I usually make this first render a high rez ‘Master’ format (say 1080p, 10bit, DNxHD in either an MFX of QT container) then can bounce this to other delivery formats as needed, eg, say MP4, YouTube, Vimeo etc. Then drop that audio master back into the Resolve Timeline, check, & render the whole thing out to the required delivery format At this point I could also fly it over to Wavelab if I wanted, but usually Nuendo is fine with the whole thing. Then bounce a final audio master & in my case, loudness Normalise to -16LUFS. Then do the usual DAW stuff, de-verb, de-noise, trim, finish or add music cues, etc. Import in Nuendo then, it nicely puts the movie on its own track and extracts each of the audio tracks and places them on their own tracks as well (nice feature, Steinberg). What I do is select a suitable video codec and size for Nuendo, then in the audio export component of this, each track can be individually selected, ie, this then becomes a multi-track audio /movie file. There are a number of ways to do this (personally, I find AAF a little unreliable). Render out (via delivery page) a suitable movie size /format & individual audio tracks in preparation for Nuendo. Resolve ‘can’ produce this, but I still find that a bit clunky. Workflow is usually something like:Īssemble, edit and produce all of the footage (say 1 hr doco format for example) Assemble and prepare all of the audio tracks, including voice-over, wild camera sound, SFX, music temp etc. round tripping, this is precisely what I do with all of my projects, between Resolve Studio 16 and Nuendo 10. Fairlight offers far more in terms of audio production than any other NLE available in my view most are toys. Resolve includes a sophisticated (though a little non-standard) DAW in its Fairlight page following the purchase of that company a few years ago. If for TV or pro film industry, there are a zillion options there - and this is Resolve’s background setting /expectation. No, it does not include DVD burning, that is a far rarer consumer format these days otherwise, it would be more usual to (say) make an Mp4 and distribute that via cloud, stick, whichever. Much of this thread seems to relate to Resolve’s Delivery page (export) and that indeed has many, many options including to FCPX, Pro Tools, AAF, H264, YouTube, masering formats like Atom, etc. I’ve have also worked with Adobe Premier & Final Cut Pro X over many years as well. It is certainly a very mature package now, not perfect by any means, though no packages are & certainly in the realm of NLEs. I’ve been using DaVinci Resolve Studio consistently since v12, have been through the beta testing cycles of v14, 15 & 16 with Blackmagic now on the current version 16.1.1. Wondering if anyone uses DaVinci Resolve 16 for video editing, and your opinion on the suite.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |